President Trump has given the Ayatollah and his inner circle a two-month deadline to submit to his demands. For the Ayatollah and his cronies, this ultimatum presents a grim reality with little to no viable options. As an Iranian-Australian deeply concerned about the human, democratic, and citizenship rights of my people—who are the sovereign owners of their country and its resources—the outcome itself is secondary. The key issue is the inevitable reckoning for a regime that has long oppressed its citizens. However, from the perspective of Iran’s ruling elite, the choice before them is a "death-death" scenario. Scenario One: Submission to Trump’s Demands Should the Ayatollah accept President Trump’s demands, this would not be a negotiation in the traditional sense but a total surrender. It would signal the beginning of a new Iran—one where political prisoners and prisoners of conscience must be released , and the persecution of those demanding basic rights is finally brought ...
Amid the bombings and global commentary from pundits and power brokers on the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, the elephant in the room remains ignored — Iran’s illegitimate constitution, and more importantly, her silenced people. Expert commentary and analysis continue to revolve around a flawed premise: that the Islamic Republic, as it has existed for the past 46 years, will endure — with clerics merely rotating power among themselves, ruling under the same unlawful and illegitimate constitution, once again without the consent or participation of the Iranian people. In light of the recent 12-day conflict initiated by Israel against the Ayatollah’s regime in Iran—with the United States also targeting three major nuclear sites—experts have pointed out that the Ayatollah and his inner circle’s decades-long investment in proxy groups across the Middle East has largely failed to yield the intended outcomes. This naturally prompts a question: Were Israel and Western powers inattentive o...
The future of the Islamic Republic may ultimately depend on what kind of aircraft lands in Tehran first. One could carry diplomats and signal a quiet surrender of power. The other would arrive amid chaos and force. After forty years of repression, corruption, and regional violence, Iran’s ruling system now faces a choice it has long tried to postpone: a negotiated exit or a catastrophic collapse. Two radically different futures confront the Islamic Republic, both visible on the short- to mid-term horizon. In one scenario, a plane carrying senior U.S. officials—perhaps even Air Force One—lands in Tehran. Such an arrival would signal not reconciliation, but capitulation: the collapse of ideological rigidity and the beginning of an orderly dismantling of the regime itself. It would mean the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps relinquishing their four-decade grip on Iran’s wealth—assets systematically looted, embezzled, and diverted to violent proxies across the Midd...
Comments
Post a Comment