Shiite Caliphate Miscalculation and Delusion

Shiite Caliphate and his Foreign Affairs spokesperson, Mr Javad Zarif, have apparently miscalculated the date on which their reliefs demand to arrive simultaneously with the arrival of President Biden to the White House.

Since 2018, when former President Trump left the JCPOA agreement, the Caliphate and his regime are under heavy US sanctions where the economy of his regime is at the verge of collapse. 

He and his spokesperson, Mr Zarif, invested heavily on President Biden to win the US election and lifting the sanctions by his arrival at the White House. They even be clearly belligerent and delusional enough to set a date, February 2021, and demand the sanctions be lifted or else! That 'or else' could possibly be translated to the news of explosions heard on Tuesday above Riyadh, the Saudi's Capital. 


These explosions appear to be in response to the recent accusation by the France's Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian that the Caliphate regime is building a nuclear weapon. Well, if the Caliphate and Mr Zarif were surprised of the France's response; they must not have.  

Perhaps they miscalculated the resolve of the Biden White House and the US Western allies toward the terrorism, regional and international peace and security. That is the kind of thuggish behaviour, amongst other things such as terrorism activities and aggressive conducts towards neighbouring countries and beyond, that the US and her Western allies, France included, are seriously concerned about--by the way they the same behaviour towards the people of Iran on streets and elsewhere by their thugs.  

 

But when the Caliphate and Mr Zarif’s miscalculation meets with their delusion, it gives rise to a bigger mistake--underestimating the opponents intelligence. By that mistake, they proved to be delusional when they signed the 2015 agreement and went straight back to business as usual soon after. Pursuing nuclear weapon, developing ballistic missiles capability, supporting terrorisms, attacking and/or intervening in their neighbours' affairs', destabilising the region inter alia. Former President Trump picked-up on that mistake and brought them to their senses and the reality in 2018 by exiting the agreement and imposing upon the Caliphate regime the most stringent sanctions to date.

Overall, their mistakes and lack of sense, yes, I would call it lack of sense for the Caliphate and Mr Zarif unable to imagine themselves at the table—alone with their terrorists and thugs BUT without the people of Iran critically—brings them to the point now that they are shocked and surprised to hearing a conforming response from both sides of the Atlantic. 

 

Contrary to the Caliphate’s expectation, and Mr Zarif childish ultimatum, President Immanuel Macron of France echoes his Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, in conforming with President Biden, and I would confidently say Mr Boris Johnson of number 10 in London, that Caliphate and his regime must stop the breaches of the JCPOA first, for the US to “rejoin the agreement as a starting point for follow-on negotiations.” It is not difficult to find that those 'follow-on negotiations' are mainly the ‘thuggish’ behavior which has within itself the missiles and nuclear weapon as their major components.


They may be right to have their, that is the Caliphate and his regime not Iran and her people of course, own concerns and worries as to their very existence as a Shiite Islamic State. But what they are mistaken about is the fact that Iran and her people are neither an Islamic State nor the subjects of that Caliphate, albeit currently under the sword!  


As such it must be underlined that Iran and her people would not act in a thuggery manner. They are civilized country and people which are members of the international community that respect international laws and customs. Iranian people and their country must not be taken for the Caliphate and his regime. They have nothing to do with the behaviors' and conducts of the latter. A clear and proper distinction must be drawn between the two as the latter have taken hostage the former and its resources to its benefits and power for to long. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What Comes Next for the Ayatollah?

Amid the bombings and global commentary from pundits and power brokers on the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, the elephant in the room remains ignored — Iran’s illegitimate constitution, and more importantly, her silenced people. Expert commentary and analysis continue to revolve around a flawed premise: that the Islamic Republic, as it has existed for the past 46 years, will endure — with clerics merely rotating power among themselves, ruling under the same unlawful and illegitimate constitution, once again without the consent or participation of the Iranian people. In light of the recent 12-day conflict initiated by Israel against the Ayatollah’s regime in Iran—with the United States also targeting three major nuclear sites—experts have pointed out that the Ayatollah and his inner circle’s decades-long investment in proxy groups across the Middle East has largely failed to yield the intended outcomes. This naturally prompts a question: Were Israel and Western powers inattentive o...
Read more

Two Planes, One Regime: How the Islamic Republic Will End

The future of the Islamic Republic may ultimately depend on what kind of aircraft lands in Tehran first. One could carry diplomats and signal a quiet surrender of power. The other would arrive amid chaos and force. After forty years of repression, corruption, and regional violence, Iran’s ruling system now faces a choice it has long tried to postpone: a negotiated exit or a catastrophic collapse. Two radically different futures confront the Islamic Republic, both visible on the short- to mid-term horizon. In one scenario, a plane carrying senior U.S. officials—perhaps even Air Force One—lands in Tehran. Such an arrival would signal not reconciliation, but capitulation: the collapse of ideological rigidity and the beginning of an orderly dismantling of the regime itself. It would mean the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps relinquishing their four-decade grip on Iran’s wealth—assets systematically looted, embezzled, and diverted to violent proxies across the Midd...
Read more

President Trump’s Ultimatum to the Ayatollah: A Defining Moment for Iran

Image
President Trump has given the Ayatollah and his inner circle a two-month deadline to submit to his demands. For the Ayatollah and his cronies, this ultimatum presents a grim reality with little to no viable options. As an Iranian-Australian deeply concerned about the human, democratic, and citizenship rights of my people—who are the sovereign owners of their country and its resources—the outcome itself is secondary. The key issue is the inevitable reckoning for a regime that has long oppressed its citizens. However, from the perspective of Iran’s ruling elite, the choice before them is a "death-death" scenario. Scenario One: Submission to Trump’s Demands Should the Ayatollah accept President Trump’s demands, this would not be a negotiation in the traditional sense but a total surrender. It would signal the beginning of a new Iran—one where political prisoners and prisoners of conscience must be released , and the persecution of those demanding basic rights is finally brought ...
Read more